NCLAT: Post-Submission, CoC Can’t Remit Approved Resolution Plan  ||  NCLAT: Time Extension for Payment of Sale Consid. Beyond 90 Days Can Only be Done by Adj. Authority  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Consider Allottee Financial Creditor When Allotted Unit Cancelled at their Request  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Admit Application u/s 9 of IBC When Debt is Discharged after Receipt of Demand Notice  ||  NCLAT: Delivering Demand Notice to Last Known Address to be Deemed Valid  ||  Ori. HC: It is the Duty of the Court to Decide or Deal with Grievance of Litigants  ||  Delhi High Court: Well Educated Wife Must Not Remain Idle Only for Gaining Maintenance  ||  Delhi HC: Clause of Exclusive Jurisdiction to Prevail if it Expressly Covers Arbitration Proceedings  ||  J&K HC: Section 37 of NDPS Act Comes Into Play When Bail is Being Considered on Merit  ||  Ori. HC: Although Limitation Act is Not Strictly Applicable to a Writ Petition, But the Principles Ap    

Karnataka High Court Imposes Cost on Police Officers for Registering FIR Under Section 66A of IT Act - (17 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Karnataka High Court has directed two police officers to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000 each for registering a First Information Report under Section 66 (A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which has been struck down by the Supreme Court.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   FIRST INFORMATION REPORT   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved