NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Calcutta HC Recommends Action Against District Judge for Material Irregularity in Judicial Order - (16 Jan 2020)

LIMITATION

Calcutta High Court has recommended administrative action against a District Judge for material irregularity and impropriety in a judicial order. The Court noted that the Appellant prayed for condonation of delay on several grounds including medical grounds, whereas the Lower Appellate Court failed to consider the medical certificates issued by qualified doctors exhibited by the Appellant and wrongly rejected the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   IMPROPRIETY IN JUDICIAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved