Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Calcutta HC Recommends Action Against District Judge for Material Irregularity in Judicial Order - (16 Jan 2020)

LIMITATION

Calcutta High Court has recommended administrative action against a District Judge for material irregularity and impropriety in a judicial order. The Court noted that the Appellant prayed for condonation of delay on several grounds including medical grounds, whereas the Lower Appellate Court failed to consider the medical certificates issued by qualified doctors exhibited by the Appellant and wrongly rejected the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   IMPROPRIETY IN JUDICIAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved