Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Calcutta HC Recommends Action Against District Judge for Material Irregularity in Judicial Order - (16 Jan 2020)

LIMITATION

Calcutta High Court has recommended administrative action against a District Judge for material irregularity and impropriety in a judicial order. The Court noted that the Appellant prayed for condonation of delay on several grounds including medical grounds, whereas the Lower Appellate Court failed to consider the medical certificates issued by qualified doctors exhibited by the Appellant and wrongly rejected the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   IMPROPRIETY IN JUDICIAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved