Supreme Court: Borrowers Retain Redemption Rights if Balance is Paid After Auction Deadline  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Confirmation of Seizure under Section 37A Impacts Adjudication Proceedings  ||  SC: Blacklisting After Contract Termination is Not Automatic and Needs Independent Review  ||  Grand Venice Fraud Case: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Satinder Singh Bhasin  ||  SC: Senior Employee Cannot Claim Same Lesser Penalty As Subordinate; Bank Manager's Dismissal Upheld  ||  Madras HC: Governor Must Follow Cabinet's Advice on Remission Decisions, Regardless of Personal View  ||  Kerala High Court: Entrepreneurs Must Be Protected From Baseless Protests to Boost Industrial Growth  ||  J&K&L High Court: Second FIR Valid if it Reveals a Broader Conspiracy; 'Test of Sameness' is Key  ||  Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment    

Calcutta HC Recommends Action Against District Judge for Material Irregularity in Judicial Order - (16 Jan 2020)

LIMITATION

Calcutta High Court has recommended administrative action against a District Judge for material irregularity and impropriety in a judicial order. The Court noted that the Appellant prayed for condonation of delay on several grounds including medical grounds, whereas the Lower Appellate Court failed to consider the medical certificates issued by qualified doctors exhibited by the Appellant and wrongly rejected the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   IMPROPRIETY IN JUDICIAL ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved