Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset  ||  Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay  ||  Supreme Court: Section 498A IPC Applies to Live-In Relationships in Nature of Marriage  ||  Supreme Court Awards Rs.83.38 Lakh to Child Left Paralysed, Stressing Impact on the Victim’s Future  ||  J&K and Ladakh High Court: Private Trust Cannot Oppose Wakf Takeover Without Legal Authority  ||  P&H HC: Courts Cannot Grant Protection to a Minor’s Live-In Relationship Prohibited By Law  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: NEET OMR Tampering Allegations Cannot Rest on Mere Suspicion  ||  Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction, Says a Reliable Dying Declaration Alone Can Sustain Guilt  ||  Bombay HC Criticises ITAT for Delays in Pronouncing Orders Beyond 90-Day Limit  ||  P&H High Court Criticises Punjab For Spending on Freebies and Ads While Delaying Employee Dues    

Delhi High Court: Search and Seizure Before Magistrate Not Mandatory in All Cases - (16 Jan 2020)

NARCOTICS

Delhi High Court has held that the requirement to conduct search and seizure before a Gazetted Officer/Magistrate under Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is mandatory only when the accused requires such procedure to be carried out.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SEARCH AND SEIZURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved