Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases  ||  SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension  ||  SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace  ||  SC: Women’s Representation Requirement Applies to All Bar Associations in Gujarat  ||  SC: Contempt Power isn’t Judges’ Personal Shield nor a Tool to Silence Legitimate Criticism  ||  SC: Statutory Corporation Can Deduct under S.36(1)(viii) Only for Income from Long-Term Finance  ||  NCLT Kolkata: Costs for Compromise or Arrangement Scheme not Part of Liquidation Expenses  ||  NCLT Ahmedabad: Complaints Against Auditors or Company Secretaries Not Grounds for Company Probe  ||  SC: NCLT Can Forfeit Entire Deposit if Purchaser Defaults on Payment for Liquidation Assets  ||  Meghalaya HC: Non-Signatory or Non-Existent LLP Cannot Claim Arbitration via Group of Companies    

Delhi High Court: Search and Seizure Before Magistrate Not Mandatory in All Cases - (16 Jan 2020)

NARCOTICS

Delhi High Court has held that the requirement to conduct search and seizure before a Gazetted Officer/Magistrate under Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is mandatory only when the accused requires such procedure to be carried out.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SEARCH AND SEIZURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved