Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Apex Court Says it Will Decide Larger Issue of Women’s Entry Into Religious Places - (14 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Apex Court has said that it would only examine the larger issue of faith based customs violating the fundamental rights of women and lay down guidelines for judicial scrutiny of Petitions raising issues relating to clash of faith with fundamental rights. The Court would not pronounce on Petitions seeking a Review of the Supreme Court’s Order overturning Sabarimala Shrine’s Tradition.

Tags : APEX COURT   RELIGIOUS PLACES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved