Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it  ||  Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm  ||  Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service  ||  MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide  ||  Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled  ||  SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies  ||  SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227    

Apex Court Says it Will Decide Larger Issue of Women’s Entry Into Religious Places - (14 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Apex Court has said that it would only examine the larger issue of faith based customs violating the fundamental rights of women and lay down guidelines for judicial scrutiny of Petitions raising issues relating to clash of faith with fundamental rights. The Court would not pronounce on Petitions seeking a Review of the Supreme Court’s Order overturning Sabarimala Shrine’s Tradition.

Tags : APEX COURT   RELIGIOUS PLACES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved