Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: GST Exemption on Residential Lease Applies When Building is Sub-Leased for Hostel/PG Use  ||  Rajasthan High Court: Universities Cannot Retain Students’ Original Documents for Pending Fees  ||  NCLT: Damages from Contractual Disputes Cannot Form Basis for Initiating Insolvency Proceedings  ||  Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience    

Apex Court Says it Will Decide Larger Issue of Women’s Entry Into Religious Places - (14 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Apex Court has said that it would only examine the larger issue of faith based customs violating the fundamental rights of women and lay down guidelines for judicial scrutiny of Petitions raising issues relating to clash of faith with fundamental rights. The Court would not pronounce on Petitions seeking a Review of the Supreme Court’s Order overturning Sabarimala Shrine’s Tradition.

Tags : APEX COURT   RELIGIOUS PLACES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved