Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause  ||  SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended  ||  SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts  ||  J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice  ||  Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted  ||  Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing    

Apex Court Says it Will Decide Larger Issue of Women’s Entry Into Religious Places - (14 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Apex Court has said that it would only examine the larger issue of faith based customs violating the fundamental rights of women and lay down guidelines for judicial scrutiny of Petitions raising issues relating to clash of faith with fundamental rights. The Court would not pronounce on Petitions seeking a Review of the Supreme Court’s Order overturning Sabarimala Shrine’s Tradition.

Tags : APEX COURT   RELIGIOUS PLACES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved