SC: Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot Follow if an Officer is Discharged on the Same Charge  ||  SC Clarified the Distinction Between Arbitration “Seat” And “Venue” While Summarising Key Principles  ||  Supreme Court: Wife and Her Family Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry-Giving Based On Her Complaint  ||  SC: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the Ground of Order II Rule 2 Bar  ||  Supreme Court Has Issued an SOP Prescribing Strict Timelines For Filing Legal Aid Appeals  ||  Madras HC: Dhurandhar 2 Release Cannot be Stalled Due to Objections From a Small Section  ||  Delhi HC: Lokpal May Form Prima Facie Opinion Before Show Cause Notice Without Prior Hearing  ||  Bom HC: Family Courts Cannot Casually Order a Spouse’s Medical Examination to Assess Mental Health  ||  Bombay HC: Child Care Leave Protects Motherhood and Denial Violates Rights of Mother and Child  ||  Supreme Court: Amalgamating Company Loss Cannot be Set Off Against Amalgamated Income    

Delhi High Court Restrains Eveready, McLeod Russel from Sale of Assets - (24 Dec 2019)

CIVIL

Delhi High Court has passed an ad-interim ex parte order of injunction preventing McLeod Russel, Eveready Industries and other Williamson Magor Group companies from selling or transferring any of their assets, changing their capital structure, or opting for any debt restructuring proposal. The Court’s order restrains all these companies from carrying out their plans.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   EVEREADY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved