Del. HC: Denying Seat to Candidate Due to Administrative Fault Would be Unjust || All. HC: Not Mandatory for Passport Authority to Impound Passport of Accused Persons || Raj. HC: In Absence of Statutory Rules, Denying Appt. on Basis of Minimum Height is Discriminatory || MP HC: Party Required to Lay Factual Foundation for Getting Benefit of Section 65 of Evidence Act || Ker. HC: Settlement of Cases Including Offence of Rape & POCSO Act Offences is Not Permissible || Gujarat High Court: Wife Allowed to Become Guardian & Manager of Husband in Coma || SC: Partition of Property Can’t be Done by Metes & Bounds in Chandigarh || SC Approves Requirement for Judicial Officers to be Converse With Local Language || Kerala High Court: Denial of Ordinary Leave Reduces Convict’s Chances of Rehabilitation || Delhi HC Issues Circular Regarding Pass-Overs or Adjournments in Bail, Parole Matters

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :