Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises || Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official || MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel || Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together || Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act || Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Woman Can Reclaim Gifts Given to Husband at Marriage || Supreme Court: Police and Courts Should Act as Initial Filters to Prevent Baseless Prosecutions || SC: Maharashtra Can Acquire Land under Slum Areas Act, Respecting Owner's Preferential Rights || Supreme Court: Excise Exemption on Cotton Fabrics is Denied if Any Related Process Uses Power || NCLAT: IBC Auctions are Not Ordinary Contracts, and Market Volatility Does not Excuse Bid Defaults

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :