SC: Restriction u/s 80-IA(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is Not on Computing the Total Gross Income  ||  Cal. HC: Interaction of Patent Laws and Ethics is an Uncomfortable Relationship  ||  Calcutta HC: Insurance Company Must Not Withhold Claim Once Liability is Established  ||  Del. HC: Speedy Trial, Firmly Entrenched in our Constitutional Jurispr. is Not an Abstract Safeguard  ||  P&H HC: Can’t Deny Family Pension to Specially Abled Daughter Only because She Got Married  ||  Kerala HC: Pendency of Civil Suit No Bar on Directing Eviction of Aggressor from Shared Household  ||  Delhi HC: Trademark Rights Do Not Arise in Abstract but Through Tangible Trading  ||  SC: Can’t Dismiss Partition Suit at Preliminary Stage If Benami Exception is Pleaded  ||  SC: Up to Rank of APCCF, IAS Officers Can’t Write Annual Confidential Reports of IFS Officers  ||  SC Issues Directions for Reforming Appointment and Functioning of Consumer Commissions    

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE   ADJUDICATION   COSTS   COMMISSIONER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved