NCLAT: Corporate Debtor’s Guarantor Liability Unchanged Despite Internal Adjustments Among Creditors || NCLAT: Plea under IBC Section 7 Can't Be Restored After Corporate Debtor Pays Principal & Interest || Delhi HC: Wife Can Be Denied Maintenance If She Fails To Submit Latest Salary Slips || Kerala HC: Income of Parent Who Abandoned Family Shouldn’t Count For EWS Reservation Eligibility || Gujarat HC: Writ Courts Interfering in Arbitral Procedure Orders Defies A&C Act’s Purpose || Delhi HC: Plaintiff Doesn’t Have Vested Right to File Rejoinder under CPC || J&K&L HC: Name Change Is Fundamental Right; Boards Must Consider Legal Documents, Not Reject Request || SC: Administrative Delays by State Agencies Must Not Be Condoned || Sc: When Sale Deed Is Void, Possession Suit Follows 12-Year Limitation under Article 65, Not Art 59 || SC: Preliminary Inquiry Report Can’t Stop Court from Directing FIR Registration

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :