NCLAT: Cannot Withhold Income Tax Refund Received by Bank During CIRP In CD's Account || All. HC: With S. 111 of BNS Covering 'Organised Crime' It Appears Gangsters Act has become Redundant || P&H HC: Cannot Allow Changes in Admission Form after Submission || Bom. HC: Findings in Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Relied Upon While Adjudicating Civil Proceedings || P&H HC Directs Jail Authorities to Decide Parole Applications within Four Months || Allahabad HC: Merely Supporting Pakistan Will Not Prima Facie Attract Section 152 of BNS || HP HC Upholds Wife’s Claim of Adverse Possession after Husband’s Death || Patna HC: Maintenance may be Allowed in Disputed Marriages if Relationship Was Socially Accepted || Karnataka HC: State to Respond in 3 Weeks regarding Mandatory Teaching of Kannada || Delhi HC: Husband Unhappy in Marriage is No Proof of Abetment of Suicide

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :