Allahabad High Court : Deceased Farmer’s Odd Jobs Don’t Bar Family from Scheme Benefits || Secured Creditors' Dues Take Priority Over Govt Claims: Allahabad HC on SARFAESI & RDB Acts || Daughter Can’t Claim Mitakshara Father’s Property if He Died Pre-1956 & Son Survives: HC || Gujarat High Court: Sessions Court Can’t Suspend Sentence Just to Allow Revision Filing || Delhi High Court: Non-Combat Security Roles Crucial; Minor Lapse Risks National Safety || Punjab & Haryana HC: Allegation of Harassment Alone Insufficient to Prove Abetment to Suicide || Orissa HC: Directors Liable under S.138 NI Act Despite Company’s Insolvency || Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act || Chhattisgarh HC: Timely Appointment of Electronic Evidence Examiners Vital in Cyber Crime Probes || Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :