SC: Appeal U/S 374 CrPC/415 BNSS is Not Maintainable Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Acquittal || SC Asked the Centre to Promote Awareness About the Consequences of Driving With an Expired Licence || SC Explains How a Deceased Christian Wife's Property Devolves under the Indian Succession Act || Supreme Court: Reach Stacker isn't a Motor Vehicle; MACT Claim Not Maintainable || Supreme Court: Lift Makers, Operators and Owners Share Responsibility for User Safety || Patna HC: Pressure to Sign Divorce and Child Custody does not Amount to Cruelty || Bombay HC: Externment under the Police Act Requires Satisfaction About a Gang's Activities || Bombay HC: False Travel Distance Claim Alone Doesn't Constitute Misappropriation || J&K&L High Court: Interest on Delayed Gratuity is Not a Mandatory Pre-Deposit For an Appeal || Meghalaya HC: Meritorious Candidate Cannot Be Denied Admission For a Two-Minute Delay

Imposition of cost by CESTAT on grounds of quality of adjudication order- (Ministry of Finance ) (22 Dec 2015)

MANU/EXCT/0067/2015

Excise

The Ministry of Finance has released an Instruction to Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners of the Department to sensitize adjudicating authorities about the issue of imposition of costs by Tribunals due to poor quality of adjudication. It acknowledges the need to critically examine orders passed in favour of Department by CESTAT, as is done for orders passed by the Tribunal in favour of Assessees.

Tags : EXCISE ADJUDICATION COSTS COMMISSIONER

Share :