Bom. HC: Cannot Book Lawyer for Asking CBI Officers to Show their Identity Cards  ||  Allahabad HC: Definition of Dependent Family to Include ‘Widowed Daughter’  ||  Ker. HC: Under 'Recruitment by Transfer', Prescribed Conditions Need to be Scrupulously Followed  ||  SC: Litigant Owes a Duty to be Vigilant about Pending Judicial Proceedings  ||  SC: Superior Courts Should Avoid Adverse Comments on Personal Conduct & Caliber of Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Higher Court Can Examine Existence of Jurisdi. Fact Even if Trial Court Fails to Frame Issue  ||  SC: Confession by Accused, in Custody Not Admissible Except to the Extent of Applicability of S. 27  ||  Gauhati HC: DRT Has to Dispose of Application under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act as per RDB Act  ||  Kerala HC: Showing or Waving Black Flag to a Person Cannot Amount to Defamation  ||  Del. HC: Merit Based Review of Arb. Award Involving Reappraisal of Factual Findings is Impermissible    

Supreme Court Says Sabarimala Tradition Age-Old, Refuses Women's Plea - (13 Dec 2019)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has refused to pass an order on a plea by two women to allow them entry into the Sabarimala temple. The Court said, "We will endeavour to constitute a seven-judge bench at the earliest, and these matters would be taken up after the decision of this bench. "Every woman who wants to go, must go. But, the situation in the country becomes explosive, we don`t want any violence. There is a judgment, but it is not the last word on the issue".

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SABARIMALA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved