Supreme Court: Benefit of Section 436A CrPC Extends Even to Accused Under PMLA  ||  Supreme Court: Can’t Order Confiscation of Vehicle Without Hearing its Registered Owner  ||  Allahabad High Court: Taunting a Person for Giving Less Dowry Not a Penal Offence  ||  All. HC: Collector Being Quasi-Judicial Authority Has No Statutory Power to Review/Recall Order  ||  All HC: High Court Appointing Arbitrator has Power to Extend Arbitrator's Mandate u/s 29A of A&C Act  ||  SC: Centre Recommended to Frame Comprehensive Sentencing Policy  ||  Supreme Court: Court Which Granted Bail Can Cancel it if Serious Allegations Made  ||  Supreme Court: SEZ Developers Must Apply for Recognition and be Scrutinized  ||  SC: Comments to be Made Within Public View to Punish Person for Casteist Insults Under SC/ ST Act  ||  P&H HC: Bail Petition Rejected of Travel Agent Accused of Defrauding a Man for Processing Visa    

Supreme Court Reiterates Detailed Reasons Need not be Recorded while Framing Charges - (04 Dec 2019)


Supreme Court has observed that for framing the charges under Section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 a trial judge is not required to record detailed reasons. The Court further noted that at the time of framing the charges only prima facie case is to be seen and that whether case is beyond reasonable doubt is not to be seen at this stage.


Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved