NCLAT: Corporate Debtor’s Guarantor Liability Unchanged Despite Internal Adjustments Among Creditors  ||  NCLAT: Plea under IBC Section 7 Can't Be Restored After Corporate Debtor Pays Principal & Interest  ||  Delhi HC: Wife Can Be Denied Maintenance If She Fails To Submit Latest Salary Slips  ||  Kerala HC: Income of Parent Who Abandoned Family Shouldn’t Count For EWS Reservation Eligibility  ||  Gujarat HC: Writ Courts Interfering in Arbitral Procedure Orders Defies A&C Act’s Purpose  ||  Delhi HC: Plaintiff Doesn’t Have Vested Right to File Rejoinder under CPC  ||  J&K&L HC: Name Change Is Fundamental Right; Boards Must Consider Legal Documents, Not Reject Request  ||  SC: Administrative Delays by State Agencies Must Not Be Condoned  ||  Sc: When Sale Deed Is Void, Possession Suit Follows 12-Year Limitation under Article 65, Not Art 59  ||  SC: Preliminary Inquiry Report Can’t Stop Court from Directing FIR Registration    

Allahabad High Court: Evidence not Part of Case Diary Cannot Form Basis for Taking Cognizance - (29 Nov 2019)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Allahabad High Court has clarified that material which does not form part of the case diary nor has been collected by the Investigating Officer cannot be considered for taking cognizance while quashing the summoning order passed by a Judicial Magistrate.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved