Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing  ||  Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration    

Allahabad High Court: Evidence not Part of Case Diary Cannot Form Basis for Taking Cognizance - (29 Nov 2019)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Allahabad High Court has clarified that material which does not form part of the case diary nor has been collected by the Investigating Officer cannot be considered for taking cognizance while quashing the summoning order passed by a Judicial Magistrate.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved