SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Supreme Court: Assignment of Interest is not Valid because it was not Clearly Prohibited in Contract - (27 Nov 2019)

CONTRACT

Supreme Court has observed that assignment of contractual interest cannot be held to be valid merely because there is no clear bar against assignability stipulated in the contract. The Court noted that it has to be seen whether the terms of the contract and the circumstances in which the contract was entered into lead to an inference that the parties did not intend to make their interest assignable.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved