P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Supreme Court: Assignment of Interest is not Valid because it was not Clearly Prohibited in Contract - (27 Nov 2019)

CONTRACT

Supreme Court has observed that assignment of contractual interest cannot be held to be valid merely because there is no clear bar against assignability stipulated in the contract. The Court noted that it has to be seen whether the terms of the contract and the circumstances in which the contract was entered into lead to an inference that the parties did not intend to make their interest assignable.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved