NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Supreme Court: Assignment of Interest is not Valid because it was not Clearly Prohibited in Contract - (27 Nov 2019)

CONTRACT

Supreme Court has observed that assignment of contractual interest cannot be held to be valid merely because there is no clear bar against assignability stipulated in the contract. The Court noted that it has to be seen whether the terms of the contract and the circumstances in which the contract was entered into lead to an inference that the parties did not intend to make their interest assignable.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved