Allahabad HC: Person Reposing Faith in Islam Cannot Claim Right in Nature of Live-in-Relationship  ||  Bom. HC: Renaming of Aurangabad and Osmanabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar And Dharashiv Upheld  ||  SC: Time Limit u/s 14(3) of JJ Act to Ascertain Physical & Mental Health of Juvenile is Directory  ||  SC: History Sheets Shouldn’t Contain Name of Innocent Indiv. Solely Because of their Caste or Backg.  ||  Centre to Withdraw Letter Asking States to Not Take Action Against Ayurvedic & Ayush Products Ads  ||  Centre to Withdraw Letter Asking States to Not Take Action Against Ayurvedic & Ayush Products Ads  ||  Directions Against Misleading Advertisements Issued by Supreme Court  ||  Del. HC: Rs. 1 Lakh Cost Imposed on Person Who Made Lord Hanuman Party in Property Dispute  ||  Ker. HC: Termination of 27 Weeks Pregnancy Citing Foetal Abnormalities Permitted  ||  SC: Inclined to Hold That Accused in One Case Shouldn’t be Denied Anticipatory Bail in Another Case    

Supreme Court: Assignment of Interest is not Valid because it was not Clearly Prohibited in Contract - (27 Nov 2019)

CONTRACT

Supreme Court has observed that assignment of contractual interest cannot be held to be valid merely because there is no clear bar against assignability stipulated in the contract. The Court noted that it has to be seen whether the terms of the contract and the circumstances in which the contract was entered into lead to an inference that the parties did not intend to make their interest assignable.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved