Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Allahabad High Court Stays Hiring of Contractual Employees by State Government - (25 Nov 2019)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Allahabad High Court has restrained the State Government from engaging service providers to provide contractual employees against regular sectioned posts, and sought the State Government’s explanation on the issue. The Court directed the State Government to explain within a week why the sanctioned posts were not being filled and whether it was permissible after judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of “State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi” of 2006.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved