Supreme Court: Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ In Heated Exchange Isn’t Obscenity under IPC Section 294  ||  Supreme Court: Even a Single Tainted Public Work Award Violates Article 14  ||  Supreme Court Upholds Lease Cancellation, Denies Relief for Failure to Develop Allotted Land  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Medical Negligence Case, Says Surgeon Best Placed To Choose Procedure  ||  Supreme Court: Sajjadanashin of a Dargah and Mutawalli of a Waqf are Distinct Roles  ||  Supreme Court: Criminal Proceedings Can be Quashed if Reliable Evidence Disproves Allegations  ||  Delhi HC: Promises by CM at Press Conferences are Not Legally Enforceable Without Policy Support  ||  Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction  ||  Allahabad HC: Challenges to Tribunal Orders Must be Filed in the HC With Territorial Jurisdiction  ||  J&K&L HC: Historical Books Cannot Establish Private Property Titles under Section 57 Evidence Act    

Supreme Court Refers Sabarimala Case to Larger Bench - (14 Nov 2019)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has referred petitions seeking a review of its decision to allow the entry of women of all age groups in Kerala's Sabarimala Temple to a larger seven-judge bench. The Apex Court observed that the question of whether women of all ages should be allowed into Sabarimala was part of a larger debate that also includes issues like allowing Muslim and Parsi women to enter religious practice.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SABARIMALA CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved