CCPA Fines Chaayos Rs.50,000 for Default Inclusion of Service Charge in Bills  ||  MP HC: Major Unmarried Daughter Need Not Prove Disability to Claim Maintenance if Unable to Earn  ||  Madras HC: Travel Costs Must be Reimbursed to Independent Special Public Prosecutors  ||  MP HC: Timely Coordination Between Police, Banks and Telecom Bodies is Crucial in Cyber Fraud  ||  Kerala HC: Foreign Counsel Cannot Conduct Cross-Examination Before Commissioners  ||  Allahabad HC: Proclaimed Offenders Get Anticipatory Bail Only in Rare and Exceptional Cases  ||  Madras HC: Repeated Intimacy Alone Doesn't Prove Consent; Coercion & Deception Must be Examined  ||  SC: Government Can Revise Royalty under the MMDR Act Despite a Silent Lease Deed  ||  SC: Recovery of a Weapon Alone is Insufficient to Prove Guilt Without Conscious Possession  ||  SC: Section 68 of Evidence Act Does Not Require Attesting Witnesses to Prove Registered Sale Deeds    

Supreme Court Refers Sabarimala Case to Larger Bench - (14 Nov 2019)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has referred petitions seeking a review of its decision to allow the entry of women of all age groups in Kerala's Sabarimala Temple to a larger seven-judge bench. The Apex Court observed that the question of whether women of all ages should be allowed into Sabarimala was part of a larger debate that also includes issues like allowing Muslim and Parsi women to enter religious practice.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SABARIMALA CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved