J&K&L High Court: Transfer Guidelines are Not Binding and Cannot Limit an Employer’s Transfer Powers  ||  Calcutta High Court: Procedural Delays Cannot Deny a Person’s Right to Adopt  ||  J&K&L HC: Pardoned Approver under Section 343 BNSS Need Not Stay in Custody Till Trial Ends  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  Allahabad HC: Civil Imprisonment For Default Does Not Absolve a Husband’s Duty to Pay Maintenance  ||  Supreme Court: SC Status Applies Only to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, and is Lost on Conversion  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Moratorium, Creditors Cannot Adjust Pre-CIRP Dues From Prior Deposits  ||  Supreme Court: CoC’s Commercial Wisdom Does Not Shield All its Decisions From Judicial Scrutiny  ||  SC Flags Systemic Bias in Granting Permanent Commission to Women Officers in Armed Forces    

Supreme Court Refers Sabarimala Case to Larger Bench - (14 Nov 2019)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has referred petitions seeking a review of its decision to allow the entry of women of all age groups in Kerala's Sabarimala Temple to a larger seven-judge bench. The Apex Court observed that the question of whether women of all ages should be allowed into Sabarimala was part of a larger debate that also includes issues like allowing Muslim and Parsi women to enter religious practice.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SABARIMALA CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved