Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

NAA Finds Glenmark Guilty of not Passing GST Rate Cut on Sanitary Napkin to Customers - (23 Oct 2019)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

National Anti-Profiteering Authority has ruled Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd guilty of not passing GST rate cut benefit on sanitary napkin to customers. The all-powerful Goods and Services Tax Council headed by the Finance Minister in July 2018 had reduced the tax rate on sanitary napkin from 12 per cent to nil and it was expected that the companies would pass on the entire benefit of rate cut to the customers.

Tags : NAA   SANITARY NAPKIN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved