SC: Participation In Arbitration Does Not Bar Challenging Arbitrator’s Inherent Jurisdiction  ||  J&K&L High Court: Transfer Guidelines are Not Binding and Cannot Limit an Employer’s Transfer Powers  ||  Calcutta High Court: Procedural Delays Cannot Deny a Person’s Right to Adopt  ||  J&K&L HC: Pardoned Approver under Section 343 BNSS Need Not Stay in Custody Till Trial Ends  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  Allahabad HC: Civil Imprisonment For Default Does Not Absolve a Husband’s Duty to Pay Maintenance  ||  Supreme Court: SC Status Applies Only to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, and is Lost on Conversion  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Moratorium, Creditors Cannot Adjust Pre-CIRP Dues From Prior Deposits  ||  Supreme Court: CoC’s Commercial Wisdom Does Not Shield All its Decisions From Judicial Scrutiny    

Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with High Court Order in Rs 7,200 Crore Satyam Fraud Case - (15 Oct 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Hyderabad High Court’s order that set aside an Enforcement Directorate order provisionally attaching Tech Mahindra’s fixed deposits worth Rs 822 crore. The Court while refusing any relief in the case, said that it will finally decide on November 26 the larger issue of whether Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can override other laws like Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 among others.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SATYAM FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved