SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger  ||  SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith  ||  Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body  ||  Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court  ||  J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies    

Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with High Court Order in Rs 7,200 Crore Satyam Fraud Case - (15 Oct 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Hyderabad High Court’s order that set aside an Enforcement Directorate order provisionally attaching Tech Mahindra’s fixed deposits worth Rs 822 crore. The Court while refusing any relief in the case, said that it will finally decide on November 26 the larger issue of whether Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can override other laws like Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 among others.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SATYAM FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved