SC: Bribe Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt without Proof of Demand under PC Act  ||  SC: Cut Power, Water to Bulk Waste Generators Violating Solid Waste Rules  ||  SC: RPF Employee Who Conceals Criminal Case Can be Discharged at Any Stage  ||  SC: Police can Register FIR Despite Magistrate Rejecting S.156(3) CrPC Application  ||  SC: Criminal Acquittal Alone Cannot Prove Absence of Negligence in Accident Claims  ||  SC: Referral Fees Earned By Auto Dealers for Bank, Insurance Promotion Taxable as Service Tax  ||  Supreme Court Revisits the definition of “Industry”: 9-Judge Bench Reformulates the 1978 Triple Test  ||  Delhi HC: Exam Integrity is a Shared Duty of Candidates and Authorities  ||  Delhi High Court: POCSO Allows Child Witness Cross-Examination but Bars Aggressive Questioning  ||  Kerala HC: Christian Women May File Divorce Pleas Where They Reside    

Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with High Court Order in Rs 7,200 Crore Satyam Fraud Case - (15 Oct 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Hyderabad High Court’s order that set aside an Enforcement Directorate order provisionally attaching Tech Mahindra’s fixed deposits worth Rs 822 crore. The Court while refusing any relief in the case, said that it will finally decide on November 26 the larger issue of whether Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can override other laws like Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 among others.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SATYAM FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved