Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with High Court Order in Rs 7,200 Crore Satyam Fraud Case - (15 Oct 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Hyderabad High Court’s order that set aside an Enforcement Directorate order provisionally attaching Tech Mahindra’s fixed deposits worth Rs 822 crore. The Court while refusing any relief in the case, said that it will finally decide on November 26 the larger issue of whether Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can override other laws like Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 among others.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SATYAM FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved