Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Supreme Court Declines to Interfere with High Court Order in Rs 7,200 Crore Satyam Fraud Case - (15 Oct 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Hyderabad High Court’s order that set aside an Enforcement Directorate order provisionally attaching Tech Mahindra’s fixed deposits worth Rs 822 crore. The Court while refusing any relief in the case, said that it will finally decide on November 26 the larger issue of whether Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 can override other laws like Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 among others.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SATYAM FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved