Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree  ||  Delhi High Court: Law Firms Must Verify Cited Case Laws; Senior Counsel Not Responsible for Finality  ||  MP High Court Dismisses Shah Bano’s Daughter’s Plea, Rules ‘Haq’ Movie is Fiction  ||  Bombay HC Cancels ERC Order, Rules Stakeholders Must Be Heard Before Amending Multi-Year Tariff  ||  Calcutta High Court Rules Dunlop’s Second Appeal Not Maintainable under the Trade Marks Act  ||  Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs  ||  Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction  ||  Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers    

Apex Court Gives Clean Chit to Government Job Promise Default - (11 Oct 2019)

LABOUR & INDUSTRIAL

Apex Court has ruled that displaced workers have no absolute fundamental right to employment and a Government can in “overriding public interest” renege on a job promise to a group without having to provide “individual opportunities” to everyone in the group. It set aside the findings of a Single Judge and a division bench of Kerala High Court that said that the Kerala Govt could not abandon its promise to absorb the arrack workers rendered jobless by the 1996 ban on the liquor in the State.

Tags : APEX COURT   GOVERNMENT JOB  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved