SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227  ||  SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder  ||  Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act  ||  Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory  ||  Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service  ||  Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC    

Apex Court Gives Clean Chit to Government Job Promise Default - (11 Oct 2019)

LABOUR & INDUSTRIAL

Apex Court has ruled that displaced workers have no absolute fundamental right to employment and a Government can in “overriding public interest” renege on a job promise to a group without having to provide “individual opportunities” to everyone in the group. It set aside the findings of a Single Judge and a division bench of Kerala High Court that said that the Kerala Govt could not abandon its promise to absorb the arrack workers rendered jobless by the 1996 ban on the liquor in the State.

Tags : APEX COURT   GOVERNMENT JOB  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved