Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Apex Court Gives Clean Chit to Government Job Promise Default - (11 Oct 2019)

LABOUR & INDUSTRIAL

Apex Court has ruled that displaced workers have no absolute fundamental right to employment and a Government can in “overriding public interest” renege on a job promise to a group without having to provide “individual opportunities” to everyone in the group. It set aside the findings of a Single Judge and a division bench of Kerala High Court that said that the Kerala Govt could not abandon its promise to absorb the arrack workers rendered jobless by the 1996 ban on the liquor in the State.

Tags : APEX COURT   GOVERNMENT JOB  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved