Kar. HC: Accused Can’t Seek Bail on Completing 1/3rd Sentence if Booked in Multiple Cases  ||  SC: Concerning that Criminal Law is Being Used Against Men Once Consensual Relationship Ends  ||  SC: Changing Religion Just to Avail Benefit of Reservation Without Genuine Belief Amounts to Fraud  ||  All. HC: Two Public Employers May Have Different Views Regarding Suitability of Candidate  ||  Pat. HC: Division Bench Must Hear Together Criminal Appeals Arising From Same Judgment  ||  Del. HC: Revenue Needs to Spell Out Clear Ground for Initiating Penalty Proceedings  ||  Delhi HC: Incorrect Classification of Goods Would Not Ipso Facto Amount to Collusion  ||  HP HC: Can’t Entertain Petition u/s 34 Filed beyond Limitation Period Unless Sufficient Cause Shown  ||  SC: ‘Sufficient Cause’ u/s 29A Should be Interpreted in Context of Facilitating Dispute Resolution  ||  SC Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Words 'Socialist' & 'Secular' in Preamble    

Bombay High Court to MahaRERA: Decide if RERA is Applicable - (16 Sep 2019)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has ruled while providing relief to the residents of the Wadala-based New Cuffe Parade apartments that the Adjudicating Officer or the judge of the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) must decide if the provisions of the RERA law be invoked against Lodha developers in the case. The residents had challenged the orders of the Adjudicating Officer of the MahaRERA, who had referred their complaints to a full bench of the Tribunal.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   RERA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved