Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause  ||  SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended  ||  SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts  ||  J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice  ||  Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted  ||  Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing    

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Reply on PIL Challenging Triple Talaq Law - (13 Sep 2019)

FAMILY

Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Central Government seeking its Reply on public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the validity of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019, which criminalises Triple Talaq. The Court sought the Centre`s response on PIL moved by advocate Kamlesh Kumar Mitra on behalf of Muslim Advocate Association of Andhra Pradesh that claimed the Act violates the several provisions of the Constitution.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   TRIPLE TALAQ LAW  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved