Delhi High Court: Assets From Illegal Cricket Betting are Proceeds of Crime Attachable by ED  ||  Delhi HC: Extension to Issue SCN U/S 110 of The Customs Act Must be Granted Before Six Months Expire  ||  Delhi HC: Statements to Customs under Section 108 During Goods Seizure Aren't Admissible As Evidence  ||  Delhi HC: Oral Waiver of a Show-Cause Notice is Invalid And Continued Detention of Goods is Unlawful  ||  Supreme Court: Letter of Intent is a 'Promise in Embryo', Rights Arise Only After Conditions Met  ||  SC Auction Sale under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC Cannot Be Challenged on Pre-Proclamation Grounds  ||  NCLT Kochi: CoC May Invite Fresh Bids, Regulations Only Restrict Alteration of Existing Bids  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Father Must Provide Maintenance and Marriage Expenses to Unmarried Adult Daughter  ||  Delhi HC Rules That ‘Hermès’ and the 3D Shape of its ‘Birkin’ Bag are Well-Known Trademarks in India  ||  Kerala HC: Arrest is Illegal if Accused isn’t Produced in 24 Hours and Rearrest From Prison is Barred    

Apex Court: Application under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Not Valid - (28 Aug 2019)

ARBITRATION

Apex Court has ruled that an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996/Arbitration Act for appointment of an arbitrator in relation to disputes with National Highways Authority of India is not sustainable in view of Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 which provides for such appointment by the Central Government.

Tags : APEX COURT   ARBITRATOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved