Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9  ||  Tripura HC: Tax Authorities Cannot Revive Repealed VAT Powers or Retain Deposits Without Law  ||  J&K&L HC: Obtaining a Passport is a Constitutional Right; Citizens Need Not Prove Travel Necessity  ||  Allahabad HC: Police Report in Non-Cognizable Offence is a Complaint; Accused Must Be Heard First  ||  Kerala HC: Hospitals Must Display Rates and Cannot Deny Emergency Care For Lack of Advance Payment  ||  Orissa HC: Convict’s Refusal to Appeal Through Legal Aid Must be Recorded in Writing  ||  SC Halts Deer Translocation From Delhi’s AN Jha Park And Orders a Probe into DDA Negligence    

Supreme Court Explains Civil Suit Objecting Jurisdiction of Arbitrator not Valid - (26 Aug 2019)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has explained that a suit for injunction and declaration challenging the jurisdiction of arbitrator is not valid. The Court observed that any objection with respect to existence or validity of the arbitration agreement can be raised only by way of an application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Civil Court cannot have jurisdiction to go into such question.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved