Bombay HC: Can’t Entertain Application Increasing Valuation of Suit if Pecuniary Jurisdiction Lost  ||  Bom. HC: Information of Previous Bail Applications And Orders to Be Give in All Bail Applications  ||  Cal. HC: Clause in GCC Specifying App. of Officers For Arbitration Violative of S. 12(5) of A&C Act  ||  Cal HC: High Court Lacks Jurisd. When Application u/s 9A of A&C Act Filed Before Commercial Court  ||  All. HC: Jurisdiction of GST & Central Excise Supt. Limits to Matters Not Exceeding Rs. 10 Lakh  ||  Delhi High Court: Legal Database’s Subscription Can’t Be Considered as Transfer of Copyright  ||  Centre Notifies Date for Enforcement of Criminal Laws Replacing IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act  ||  Delhi High Court: Legal Database’s Subscription Can’t Be Considered as Transfer of Copyright  ||  Del HC: Incorrect to Deny Benefits to Construction Workers For Failing to Pay For Renewal of Regist.  ||  Mad. HC: Under NDPS Act, Conscious Possession With Physical Possession Essential Element For Offence    

Supreme Court Explains Civil Suit Objecting Jurisdiction of Arbitrator not Valid - (26 Aug 2019)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has explained that a suit for injunction and declaration challenging the jurisdiction of arbitrator is not valid. The Court observed that any objection with respect to existence or validity of the arbitration agreement can be raised only by way of an application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Civil Court cannot have jurisdiction to go into such question.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved