SC: Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Correct Factual Errors Despite Alleged Concealment  ||  Supreme Court: Wrong Statement in Pleadings is Not Always a False Statement, Perjury Case Quashed  ||  SC: Under JJ Act, Murder Falls Within Heinous Offences; S. 302 IPC Prescribes Minimum Life Sentence  ||  Supreme Court: Cognisance of FERA Complaint is Invalid Without Prior Notice to the Accused  ||  Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial  ||  Supreme Court: Terror Cases Cannot Curtail Constitutional Safeguards and the Right to Fair Trial  ||  SC Upheld Husband's Conviction For Murdering His Wife over an Extramarital Affair  ||  J&K&L High Court: Mere Admission of Issuing Cheque is Not a Plea of Guilt under S.138 NI Act  ||  Calcutta HC: Aadhaar Card Prima Facie Establishes Occupation; Demolition Without Notice is Unlawful  ||  Gauhati High Court: Wildlife Law Doesn't Bar Trade in Unprotected Ornamental Fish Species    

Supreme Court: Owner Must Act Within 12 Years or Squatter Will Get Rights - (08 Aug 2019)

LIMITATION

Supreme Court has ruled that if a rightful owner of an immovable property fails to take action to get back possession within the limitation period then his rights are lost and person in possession acquires an absolute title. The Court however held that no benefit of adverse possession should be given to people who encroached upon public land.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   OWNER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved