Chhattisgarh HC: Complaints Without Disciplinary Action Cannot Affect a Judge's Seniority || Delhi HC Upholds Selection of India's Dressage Team For the 2026 Asian Games || MP High Court Orders State to Airlift Gas Pipeline Blast Victim to Ahmedabad For Treatment || Delhi HC: Memorandum of Past Oral Family Settlement Needs No Registration if No New Rights Arise || Chhattisgarh HC: Denying Marriage in Live-In Relationship Does Not Constitute Rape || Madhya Pradesh High Court: BSF Must Assess Criminal Charge Gravity Before Declaring Candidate Unfit || Bihar Tender Scam: Patna High Court Bars Media From Calling Accused 'Scamster' Before Trial || Gujarat HC Terms Plea ‘Wholly Misconceived’ and Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Cost over ASI Somnath Survey || Gauhati HC Differs on Whether ED’s ‘Reason To Believe’ For Property Attachment is Confidential || MP High Court Grants Bail To Tehelka Journalist, Noting Implication After Exposing Foeticide Racket

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :