SC: Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot Follow if an Officer is Discharged on the Same Charge || SC Clarified the Distinction Between Arbitration “Seat” And “Venue” While Summarising Key Principles || Supreme Court: Wife and Her Family Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry-Giving Based On Her Complaint || SC: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the Ground of Order II Rule 2 Bar || Supreme Court Has Issued an SOP Prescribing Strict Timelines For Filing Legal Aid Appeals || Madras HC: Dhurandhar 2 Release Cannot be Stalled Due to Objections From a Small Section || Delhi HC: Lokpal May Form Prima Facie Opinion Before Show Cause Notice Without Prior Hearing || Bom HC: Family Courts Cannot Casually Order a Spouse’s Medical Examination to Assess Mental Health || Bombay HC: Child Care Leave Protects Motherhood and Denial Violates Rights of Mother and Child || Supreme Court: Amalgamating Company Loss Cannot be Set Off Against Amalgamated Income

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :