Allahabad HC Reduces Cop's Sentence in 1984 Attempt-to-Murder Case, Awards Rs. 35,000 to Victim || Delhi High Court: Copyright Owners and ISPs Cannot Unilaterally Declare a Website 'Rogue' || Rajasthan HC: Teacher's Reprimand for Poor Attendance and Performance is Not Abetment of Suicide || Karnataka High Court: Police Assistance to Enforce Injunction Not Barred by Res Judicata || SC Upholds Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, Says ITC Depends on Supplier's Tax Payment || Supreme Court: Registration Certificate Alone Can't Secure Interim Release of Seized Vehicles || Supreme Court: IBC Moratorium Doesn't Shield Promoters, Directors From Consumer Complaints || Supreme Court: Accused Person's Advocate Cannot Remain Present During Entire Police Interrogation || Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail || Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :