Supreme Court: Promotion Remains Valid Even if an Employee's Grade Pay Stays Unchanged || SC Orders Bihar Government to Remove Ganga Riverbank Encroachments in Patna Within Six Weeks || Bombay HC: Child of Single Mother Can’t be Denied RTE Quota over Deceased Father's Caste Certificate || J&K&L HC: Complaint Dismissed Before Cognisance is Not an Acquittal & is Challengeable U/S 528 BNSS || Delhi HC Acquits Man in 2006 Rape Case, Says Names Like Ram or Mohammad do Not Define Virtue || Gujarat HC: Whatsapp Forward of Fake Newspaper Clipping Not Forgery Absent Proof of Fabrication || Supreme Court tells Parsvnath Developers to Comply with Haryana RERA Orders or Face Jail || Supreme Court: Article 142 Cannot Override a Concluded and Acted-Upon Settlement Between Parties || SC Grants One-Time Relief, Allows Law Students to Take Exams Despite Attendance Shortage || SC Grants One-Time Relief, Allows Law Students to Take Exams Despite Attendance Shortage

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :