Supreme Court: IBC Mechanism Cannot Replace Decree Execution or Recovery Proceedings || SC Orders Closure of School Over Loan Default, Directs Police-Assisted Takeover under SARFAESI Act || MP HC: HC Lacks Jurisdiction to Appoint an Arbitrator in International Commercial Disputes || Allahabad HC Imposes Rs 15L Costs on Husband For Filing False Affidavits in Maintenance Proceedings || MP HC Directs ASI to Upload Bhojshala–Kamal Maula Survey Video on Secure Platform For Litigant || Bombay HC: Public Gathering Does Not Justify Handcuffing, Awarded ?50,000 Compensation || Madras HC: Woman’s Dignity Linked to Right to Shelter; Orders Restoration of Demolished Home || SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling || Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity || Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :