SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea  ||  Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family  ||  J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation  ||  Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable  ||  Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail  ||  Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence  ||  Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla  ||  Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator    

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS   VEXATIOUS   LITIGATION   BARRED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved