Delhi HC: Property Disputes Between In-Laws and Daughter-In-Law are Not Exclusively For Family Court || Delhi High Court: After Probate is Granted, A Will Does Not Require Fresh Proof under Section 68 || Ker HC: Periodic Replacement and Maintenance of Prosthetic Limb Must Be Included in Compensation || Madras High Court: DNA Test Not Required For Mother to Donate Kidney to Her Son || Delhi HC: Pre-Summoning Evidence Opportunity Must be Granted Even in Civil-Natured Criminal Cases || J&K&L HC: UAPA Trials Cannot Linger and Must Proceed With Day-To-Day Hearing under NIA Act || Allahabad HC: FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Not Vitiated For Lack of Pre-Registration Hearing || Allahabad HC: FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Not Vitiated For Lack of Pre-Registration Hearing || Delhi HC: Private Schools May Increase Fees Without Prior Approval if Declared Before Session Begins || Supreme Court: Omission of Accused in Inquest Report Alone Does Not Indicate Innocence

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :