CCPA Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Penalty on Britannia Over Misleading ‘100% Whole Wheat Bread’ Claim || Delhi High Court Upholds SEM Notice Asking Neha Bora to Sign Peace Bond Beyond Mere Hearsay || Allahabad High Court: Rape Victims Cannot Be Denied Compensation for Lack of Medical Report || Kerala High Court Quashes Guideline Restricting Production of Arrested Persons After 5 PM || Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal of Two in Electric Fence Death of 11-Year-Old || MP High Court Allows Tree Felling for Indore Metro, Orders Phased Cutting under Expert Watch || Bombay High Court Awards Rs. 5 Lakh for Illegal Arrest, Orders Action Against Police, Magistrate || Bombay High Court Sets Aside FIR Against Pune College Staff Over Murud Beach Tragedy || Bombay High Court Proposes Forfeiting Rehab Homes of Slum Dwellers Dumping Garbage on Roads || J&K&L High Court Sets Aside Rs. 10K Cost on Senior Advocate, Says Heated Exchanges are Common

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :