Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary  ||  Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes  ||  Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding  ||  Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance  ||  Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended  ||  MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14%  ||  Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration    

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS   VEXATIOUS   LITIGATION   BARRED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved