Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely || Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction || Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage || Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt || Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation || Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims || Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it || Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction || Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay || Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :