SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits || Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings || Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor || SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title || SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC || Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers || Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO || J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A || Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required || SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law

Naresh Kumar Sehgal v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Punjab and Haryana) (31 Jul 2015)

No entertaining of petition by seeker of 'a halo of a persecuted man'

MANU/PH/2183/2015

Criminal

Taking note that the Petitioner had filed 218 petitions before court, with 20 petitions dated 20 August, 2015 alone, the High Court directed the Registry to not entertain further petitions by the Petitioner of the kind he had been filing. The Court observed that the Petitioner filed frivolous petitions 'levelling wild allegations' in the name of public cause and social work.

Relevant : Moti Lal Songara vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Anr. MANU/SC/0539/2013 M.C.D. vs. State of Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0376/2005 Dr. B. Singh vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. MANU/SC/0211/2004

Tags : FRIVOLOUS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION BARRED

Share :