Allahabad HC: Police Report in Non-Cognizable Offence is a Complaint; Accused Must Be Heard First  ||  Kerala HC: Hospitals Must Display Rates and Cannot Deny Emergency Care For Lack of Advance Payment  ||  Orissa HC: Convict’s Refusal to Appeal Through Legal Aid Must be Recorded in Writing  ||  SC Halts Deer Translocation From Delhi’s AN Jha Park And Orders a Probe into DDA Negligence  ||  Supreme Court: The Growing Trend of Succeeding Benches Overturning Earlier Judgments is Troubling  ||  SC: Administrative Orders Must be Based on Stated Reasons and Cannot Add New Grounds Later  ||  HP HC: Mixing Contraband Pouches Before Sampling Raises Serious Doubts About Accused's Possession  ||  Bombay HC: Drug Names Using International Non-Proprietary Names Cannot be Monopolized  ||  Delhi High Court: Assets From Illegal Cricket Betting are Proceeds of Crime Attachable by ED  ||  Delhi HC: Extension to Issue SCN U/S 110 of The Customs Act Must be Granted Before Six Months Expire    

Chinmay Associates Civil Contractors v. Hubli Dharwad Municipal Corporation and Ors. - (High Court of Karnataka) (28 Jul 2015)

Introducing higher standards in tender for renewal not illegal

MANU/KA/2025/2015

Commercial

In a case where the Petitioner, a civil contractor, urged that a tender by the government raised standards specifically to exclude him, the Court found in favour of the State. Though the Petitioner had performed the duties under tender for the past five years, simply fixing higher conditions in the fresh tender did not render it arbitrary. The Court, reiterating previous decisions, added that the State had to be given sufficient latitude in granting a tender and interference by courts was not warranted in the absence of misuse of power.

Relevant : Siemens Public Communication Networks Private Limited and Another v. Union of India and Others reported in MANU/SC/8245/2008 Michigan Rubber (India) Limited v. State of Karnataka and Others reported in MANU/SC/0662/2012 Directorate of Education and Others v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd., and Others reported in MANU/SC/0210/2004

Tags : TENDER   STATE   COURT INTERFERENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved