P&H HC Calls for Urgent Proposals on Prison Safety Measures  ||  Delhi HC: Summons Issued to Nashville Fried Chicken' in Trademark Infringement Suit by KFC  ||  Delhi HC: Cannot Waive Timelines under Rule 100 of Trade Marks Rules, 2017  ||  Rajasthan HC Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of News Report Claiming Non-Functioning of 16 Lok Adalats  ||  Delhi HC: Mere Suspicion of an Affair does Not Meet Threshold of Section 306 of IPC  ||  SC: Delay Should Not be Condoned Merely as an Act of Generosity  ||  SC: Married Daughter Presumed to be Financially Supported by Husband  ||  SC: Cruelty u/s 498A of IPC Can’t be Established Without Specific Instances  ||  SC: Section 10 of TPA Not Applicable to Government Allotments  ||  SC: It Is Difficult to Accept that Every Form of Playing Cards Involves Moral Turpitude    

In Re P. K. Krishnan and M/s Alkem Laboratories and All Kerala Chmists and Druggists Association - (Competition Commission of India) (01 Dec 2015)

CCI objects to Kerala Chemists and Druggists Association practices

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Commission of India found Alkem Laboratories and All Kerala Chemists and Druggists Association guilty of violating provisions under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. The informant, desirous of becoming a medical stockist had his application for appointment rejected by Alkem for failing to obtain a ‘No Objection Certificate’ from the Association. The Commission determined that such a practice of obtaining an NOC from the Association was anti-competitive practice, which adversely affected competition in the market. Alkem, though acting on the “directions and threats: of the Association was chided for not having appeared before the Commission. Its role in facilitating the practice earned it a fine of Rs. 74.63 crores; a cease and desist was issued to the Association.

Tags : NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE   KERALA   ALKEM   CHEMISTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved