SC: Forfeiture of Earnest Money Impermissible When Both Buyer and Seller are at Fault  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence Cannot Defeat Speedy Trial; Pre-Trial Detention is Punishment  ||  SC: Terrorist Act under UAPA Includes Conspiracies to Disrupt Essential Supplies, Not Just Violence  ||  Supreme Court Directs Measures to Prevent False and Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Mere Participation in Arbitration Doesn’t Bar Challenging Arbitrator; Waiver Must be in Writing  ||  SC: Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the Plaintiff, as Dominus Litis, Cannot be Forced to Add a Defendant  ||  SC: Law Does Not Change With a New Bench; Decisions of a Coordinate Bench are Binding  ||  Delhi HC Absence of Formal Arrest under Section 311A Crpc Does Not Bar Giving Handwriting Samples  ||  Del HC: Security Guards Performing Duties Cannot Be Prosecuted For Wrongful Restraint or Molestation  ||  Bombay HC: Housing Society Earning From Telecom Towers Isn’t An ‘Industry’; Staff Get No Gratuity    

ITAT Ludhiana: One-Time Settlement Debt Not Advantageous if Loan Granted Was Separate Transaction - (18 Jun 2019)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Ludhiana) has observed that the one-time settlement of debt by the bank cannot be treated as beneficial from the business under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if such loan granted to the Assessee was a separate transaction.

Tags : ITAT   LUDHIANA   LOAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved