P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

ITAT Ludhiana: One-Time Settlement Debt Not Advantageous if Loan Granted Was Separate Transaction - (18 Jun 2019)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Ludhiana) has observed that the one-time settlement of debt by the bank cannot be treated as beneficial from the business under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if such loan granted to the Assessee was a separate transaction.

Tags : ITAT   LUDHIANA   LOAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved