NCLAT: IRP Has Authority to Take Possession of Assets Owned by Corporate Debtor  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Direct Forwarding a Copy of its Order to Relevant Statutory Authorities  ||  Delhi HC: Centre to Expedite Process of Accessibility Features in OTT platforms for PwDs  ||  Delhi HC: Once Worker Provides Testimony Under Oath ‘Burden of Proof’ Shifts on Employer  ||  SC: There Cannot be Discrimination in Matter of Payment of Pension to Retired Judges  ||  SC: India is Not a Dharamshala that Can Entertain Foreign Nationals from All Over  ||  SC: Can Quash Domestic Violence Act Complaints Under Section 482 of CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Can’t Use Statement of One Accused against Another  ||  SC: Inclusion of Name in Draft NRC Cannot Annul Foreigners Tribunal’s Declaration as Non-Citizen  ||  Supreme Court: Minimum Practice of 3 Years Mandatory to Enter Judicial Service    

ITAT Ludhiana: One-Time Settlement Debt Not Advantageous if Loan Granted Was Separate Transaction - (18 Jun 2019)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Ludhiana) has observed that the one-time settlement of debt by the bank cannot be treated as beneficial from the business under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if such loan granted to the Assessee was a separate transaction.

Tags : ITAT   LUDHIANA   LOAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved