P&H HC: Offence u/s 295A won’t be Attracted if Act done Without Malicious Intent  ||  Ker. HC: No Liability on RTO to Pay Compensation if Vehicle Owner Fails to get it Insured  ||  Guj. HC: Elected Members Must Not Disrepute the Institution to Which they are Elected  ||  All. HC: Scheme of A&C Act Put no Limitation for Application of Doctrine of Severability to an Award  ||  Kar. HC: Apprehension of Not Getting a Fair Trial is Required to Seek Transfer of Case  ||  Ker. HC: Not Granting Divorce Despite Mutual Consent Amounts to Cruelty  ||  Tel. HC: Elders in the House Can’t Decide Custody of Child  ||  All. HC: Gravity of Misconduct and Past Conduct Relevant to be Considered by Disciplinary Authority  ||  P&H HC Issues Guidelines on Proclamation u/s 82 CrPC  ||  SC: Can File Complaint Under Repealed FERA Provisions During Sunset Period After Enforcement of FEMA    

ITAT Ludhiana: One-Time Settlement Debt Not Advantageous if Loan Granted Was Separate Transaction - (18 Jun 2019)

DIRECT TAXATION

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Ludhiana) has observed that the one-time settlement of debt by the bank cannot be treated as beneficial from the business under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if such loan granted to the Assessee was a separate transaction.

Tags : ITAT   LUDHIANA   LOAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2023 - All Rights Reserved