MP HC: Period Spent on Furlough Not to be Counted Towards Eligible Service for Calculating Pension  ||  Orissa HC: Once a Citizen is Duly Employed, He Cannot be Whimsically Removed  ||  Calcutta HC: Failure to Examine Weapon becomes Fatal in Cases of Circumstantial Evidence  ||  Delhi HC: Prison Authorities Can Consider a Particular Case for Grant of Parole  ||  Delhi HC: Can Arrest Accused after Curing Procedural Defects of Prior 'Illegal Arrest'  ||  Del. HC: For Purpose of Maintenance, DV Act Doesn’t Distinguish between First or Subsequent Marriage  ||  Delhi HC: Any Self-Declared Information on Matrimonial Portal is Not Reliable Proof of Income  ||  P&H HC: Authority Must Not Dismiss Appeal Merely because Accused did Not Sign the Petition  ||  SC: It is a Pleader’s Duty to Apprise the Court and Other Parties of his Client’s Death  ||  SC: For Mandatory Injunction under SRA, Breach of Obligation Must be Specifically Established    

Apex Court Quashes Criminal Case Against MP Sasikala Pushpa - (08 May 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has noted that "Vakalatnama is only a document which authorizes an advocate to appear on behalf of the party and by and large, it has no bearing on the merits of the case" while quashing a criminal case against MP Sasikala Pushpa and her husband with respect to the alleged forgery committed by them in signing the Vakalatnama.

Tags : APEX COURT   SASIKALA PUSHPA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved