Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Kewal Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (09 Apr 2019)

FIR or complaint can be quashed even in non-compoundable offences, if Court is satisfied that parties have settled disputes amicably

MANU/HP/0286/2019

Criminal

The present petition is maintained by the Petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for quashing of FIR under Sections 451, 447, 427, 342, 336, 147, 149 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) registered at Police Station. The Petitioners has argued that, as the parties have compromised the matter, vide Compromise Deed, dated 12th September, 2018, no purpose will be served by keeping the proceedings against the Petitioners and the FIR/Challan, may be quashed and set aside.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another, have held that, the ultimate object of justice is to find out the truth and punish the guilty and protect the innocent. The tendency of implicating the husband and all his immediate relations is also not uncommon. At times, even after the conclusion of the criminal trial, it is difficult to ascertain the real truth. Long and protracted criminal trials lead to rancour, acrimony and bitterness in the relationship amongst the parties. The criminal trials lead to immense sufferings for all concerned.

Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another, have held that criminal proceedings or FIR or complaint can be quashed under Section 482 of CrPC in appropriate cases in order to meet ends of justice. Even in non-compoundable offences pertaining to matrimonial disputes, if Court is satisfied that parties have settled the disputes amicably and without any pressure, then for purpose of securing ends of justice, FIR or complaint or subsequent criminal proceedings in respect of offences can be quashed.

Thus, the interest of justice will be met, in case, the proceedings are quashed, as the parties have already compromised the matter, as per compromise deed placed on record. Accordingly F.I.R registered at Police Station is ordered to be quashed and consequently, the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate arising out of the aforesaid FIR, are also ordered to be quashed. The petition is accordingly disposed.

Relevant : Preeti Gupta and Anr. vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr. MANU/SC/0592/2010, Jitendra Raghuvanshi and Ors. vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and Anr. MANU/SC/0239/2013

Tags : COMPROMISE DEED   FIR   QUASHING OF  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved