SC: In Rape Cases, Testimony of Prosecutrix Alone may be Sufficient to Find Guilt  ||  SC: Sessions Court has Authority to Summon Additional Accused at Committal Stage  ||  SC Strikes Down Notification Exempting Projects Like Schools from Obtaining Environmental Clearence  ||  SC: FIR of Confessional Nature Made by an Accused is Inadmissible in Evidence  ||  SC: Alimony from First Marriage Irrelevant to Decide Alimony from Second Marriage  ||  CJI: No Designated Senior Advocate to Orally Mention Matters  ||  SC Seeks Response from ECI regarding Deletion of 65 Lakh Voters  ||  SC: IBC Moratorium doesn’t Prevent Voluntary Return of Property When Keeping it is Unviable  ||  SC: Can Infer Creation of Trust from Circumstances when No Formal Recognition Given to Society  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Summary Judgment in Favour of Tata Power in Trademark Infringement Suit    

Notice Demanding Loan Amount Not Invalid if it is Same as Cheque Amount: SC - (19 Apr 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that a demand notice issued under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, claiming 'loan amount', does not become invalid, if it is same as the amount covered under the dishonoured cheque(s).

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved