Delhi High Court Permits Minor Rape Survivor to Terminate Pregnancy  ||  HP HC: Employees Having Good Political Relation and Influence are Hardly Sent to Hard/Tribal Area  ||  Delhi HC Stays Single Judge Rusling Asking Amazon to Pay ?339.25 Crore to 'Beverly Hills Polo Club'  ||  Gauhati HC: PIL Challenges Assam Government’s Push Back Policy  ||  Cal HC to State: Why Candidates Tainted with Scam being Given Opportunity to Reapply for Recruitment  ||  Telangana HC: Appointment of Arbitrator by One Party after Due Notice Cannot be Challenged  ||  BCI Issues Advisory Cautioning About Unauthorised LL.M Programmes  ||  Trademark Registry Approves M.S Dhoni’s Application to Officially Register ‘Captain Cool’ Trademark  ||  Delhi HC: Meta Directed to Remove Obscene Photos of Minor Girl  ||  Cal. HC: To Convict Person u/s 304B of IPC, Conclusive Proof of Cruelty before Death Required    

Absconding, by Itself, Hardly Any Evidence of Guilt: Bombay HC - (15 Apr 2019)

CRIMINAL

Bombay High Court has held that if a person is found to be on run after committing a crime, it will not be counted as “conclusive evidence” to prove his/her guilt, as even an innocent person may run away when suspected of grave crimes.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved