Lok Sabha Confirms Imposition of President Rule in Manipur  ||  AP HC: Court Possesses Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Transfer Cases on Account of Exigencies  ||  Bom. HC: Can’t Evict Tenants Under Arbitration Act if Occupying Premises Falling under DA  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction in Favour of ‘Peak XV Partners’  ||  Bombay HC: Condition that Younger Candidate Would be Preferred Over Older Candidate Violates COI  ||  Kar. HC Refuses to Entertain Petition Seeking Implementation of Circular Regarding Usage of ‘Dalit’  ||  Kar. HC: Rapido, Uber Can’t Operate in State Unless Relevant Guidelines Issued  ||  Delhi HC: Preserve CCTV Footage When Complaint against Dept. Regarding Illegal Detention in Received  ||  SC Refuses to Direct States to Establish Public Libraries  ||  SC: To Prevent Re-Litigation, Quasi-Judicial Bodies are Bound by Principles of Res-Judicata    

SERVICE - Criminal Antecedents can't be Said to be 'Clear' When Acquittal is by Granting Benefit of Doubt: SC - (30 Mar 2019)

SERVICE

Supreme Court has observed that criminal antecedents of an employee or a candidate cannot be said to be clear when he was acquitted in a criminal case on ground of benefit of doubt and not because case against him was found to be false.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   BENEFIT OF DOUBT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved