Supreme Court: Banks Cannot Invoke IBC Against Debtors For Builder-Linked Loans  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Disclosure of Failed Candidates’ Marks Does Not Imply They Passed Exams  ||  Supreme Court: Murder Accused Cannot Inherit Property of the Person Allegedly Killed  ||  Supreme Court: Delay in Deposit Does Not Automatically Cancel Contracts under Specific Relief Act  ||  SC: Railways is Treated as a Consumer under the Electricity Act, Not a Distribution Licensee  ||  Bom HC: Genuine Residents Cannot be Denied Relief Due to Aadhaar Deactivation or Biometric Mismatch  ||  Punjab & Haryana High Court: Raid on Rajinder Gupta’s Factory Soon After He Joined BJP From AAP  ||  Madhya Pradesh HC: Delay Can Be Condoned under Limitation Act Where Statute Has No Express Bar  ||  Cal HC Upholds PILs on Great Nicobar Project, Noting Alleged FRA Violations and Tribal Vulnerability  ||  Calcutta HC: Vodafone Idea Must Obtain Copyright Society Licence to Use Songs as Caller Tunes    

CRIMINAL - Magistrate Can't Release Seized Vehicle, Once Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act Initiated:SC - (27 Mar 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that a Magistrate has no jurisdiction under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure to release a seized vehicle, once the Authorised Officer initiated confiscation proceedings.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 451 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE   FOREST ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved