All. HC: Arbitrator’s Requirement to Provide Reason Hinges on Pleadings & Available Docs. on Record  ||  Supreme Court: No Provision Under GST Act for Pre-payment Prior to Adjudication  ||  Supreme Court: Cannot Set Aside Conviction Only on the Ground that Witness Turned Hostile  ||  SC: Can Use Witness Statement Recorded In Absence of Accused, if Conditions of S. 299 CrPC Fulfilled  ||  Del. HC: Administration has Turned Blind Eye Towards Functioning of Dairies in National Capital  ||  Delhi High Court: Ramping Up of Food Sampling & Testing Required in National Capital  ||  Bom. HC: Ensure Availability of Essential Infrastructure to Implement e-Mulakaat System in Prisons  ||  Supreme Court: Concept of 'Parental Alienation Syndrome' Discussed in Child Custody Dispute  ||  Allahabad HC: Person Reposing Faith in Islam Cannot Claim Right in Nature of Live-in-Relationship  ||  Bom. HC: Renaming of Aurangabad and Osmanabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar And Dharashiv Upheld    

CIVIL - Madras HC: Nothing Unfair To Treat Women and Men Differently in Matters of Safety and Security - (25 Mar 2019)

CIVIL

Madras HC while dismissing a PIL filed by some hostelers challenging the constitutionality of Tamil Nadu Hostels and Home for Women and Children (Regulation) Act, 2014 and the Rules has observed that treating men and women differently in the matter of security and safety cannot be termed as discrimi

Tags : MADRAS HC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved