NCLAT: CoC Can’t Consider Other Plan Once RP is Approved by CoC & Submitted to Authority  ||  Delhi HC: Decision to Conduct NEET Exam Lies with Concerned Authorities  ||  Del. HC: Exclusive Domain of Government to Evolve Mechanism for Compliance of Judicial Orders  ||  All. HC: UP Government to Develop Scheme Addressing Unauthorized Constructions  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Set Aside Award When Objection Not Raised before Arbitrator or Court  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Deny Passport Merely for Criminal Antecedents of Family Members  ||  Ker. HC: Can’t Use ‘Emergent Reasons’ as Ground to Remove Street Vendors  ||  J&K HC: Award Passed under MSME Act Can’t be Challenged before HC  ||  Ker. HC: To Avoid Handing Over Custody of Minor Child, False POCSO Cases are Often Launched  ||  Gujarat High Court: Cannot Deny Promotion because of Health Issues    

CRIMINAL - Mere Disclosure of Names by Witness During Trial Not Enough to Add Person as Additional Accused: SC - (14 Mar 2019)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that mere disclosure of names of some persons by witnesses during trial cannot be said to be strong and cogent evidence to summon them under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 319 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE   WITNESS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved