Delhi HC: Meta Directed to Remove Obscene Photos of Minor Girl  ||  Cal. HC: To Convict Person u/s 304B of IPC, Conclusive Proof of Cruelty before Death Required  ||  Kerala HC: Can Admit Unregistered Sale Agreements as Evidence in Specific Performance Suits  ||  Cal. HC: Can’t Allow Rectification in DOB of Employee When Age Determined through Statutory Purpose  ||  Cal. HC: Can’t Generally Use Public Exchequer Funds with Official Liquidator for Welfare of Employee  ||  Delhi HC: Can’t Reject Plaint Due to Arbitration Clause Unless Application u/s 8 is Filed  ||  Telangana HC Strikes Down State Government’s Decision to Allot Land to Arbitration Centre  ||  Karnataka HC: Salvation of the Country Lies in Identifying Human Beings as a Human Being  ||  SC Allows Stone Crusher Operation Issue to be Raised in Kerala High Court  ||  SC Set to Hear Plea Challenging Policy of Uniform Pricing for Consular Passport and Visa Services    

CRIMINAL - Cognizance Under MCOC Act Doesn't Automatically Enable Court to Frame Charges: Bombay HC - (14 Mar 2019)

CRIMINAL

Bombay High Court has held that merely because cognizance of a complaint under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes (MCOC) Act, 1999 is taken, it does not mean that concerned trial court or special court designated under MCOC Act can frame charges against accused under said Act.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED CRIMES (MCOC) ACT   1999  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved