Kerala High Court: Discretion of Appellate Court to Waive/Deposit of Minimum 20% Fine  ||  Del. HC: Article 21A of COI Not Applicable on Being Educated in a Particular School of Choice  ||  Kar. HC: Parties Can’t be Forced to Arbitration Proceed. if Not Signatory to Joint Venture Agreement  ||  Karnataka High Court: Judicial Powers Cannot be Exercised by Conciliators in Lok Adalats  ||  Mad. HC: Registering Authorities Not Empowered to Cancel Sale Deed Through Summary Proceedings  ||  Telangana High Court: Section 18 UAPA is Penal in Nature, Needs to be Proved by Prosecution  ||  Karnataka High Court: Rights of Adopted Child of Indian Parents Cannot be Left Marooned  ||  All. HC: No Authority to Additional Chief Medical Officer to File Complaint Under PCPNDT Act  ||  Kar. HC: Cannot Prosecute Second Spouse or Their Family for Bigamy Under Section 494 IPC  ||  Calcutta High Court: Person Seeking to Contest Elections is Deemed Public Interest    

CRIMINAL - Cognizance Under MCOC Act Doesn't Automatically Enable Court to Frame Charges: Bombay HC - (14 Mar 2019)

CRIMINAL

Bombay High Court has held that merely because cognizance of a complaint under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes (MCOC) Act, 1999 is taken, it does not mean that concerned trial court or special court designated under MCOC Act can frame charges against accused under said Act.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED CRIMES (MCOC) ACT   1999  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved