P&H HC Calls for Urgent Proposals on Prison Safety Measures  ||  Delhi HC: Summons Issued to Nashville Fried Chicken' in Trademark Infringement Suit by KFC  ||  Delhi HC: Cannot Waive Timelines under Rule 100 of Trade Marks Rules, 2017  ||  Rajasthan HC Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of News Report Claiming Non-Functioning of 16 Lok Adalats  ||  Delhi HC: Mere Suspicion of an Affair does Not Meet Threshold of Section 306 of IPC  ||  SC: Delay Should Not be Condoned Merely as an Act of Generosity  ||  SC: Married Daughter Presumed to be Financially Supported by Husband  ||  SC: Cruelty u/s 498A of IPC Can’t be Established Without Specific Instances  ||  SC: Section 10 of TPA Not Applicable to Government Allotments  ||  SC: It Is Difficult to Accept that Every Form of Playing Cards Involves Moral Turpitude    

COMPANY - Cheque Bounce Case Against Director: Must be Proved that Director Responsible for Company's Conduct - (11 Mar 2019)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has reiterated that, a 'cheque bounce' complaint against a Company and its Director, must contain a specific averment that Director was in charge of, and responsible for, conduct of company's business at the time when offence U/S- 138/141 of Negotiable Instruments Act was committed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE AGAINST DIRECTOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved