Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

J.D.Singh Vs. Delhi Disputes Resolution Society - (Central Information Commission) (24 Nov 2015)

RTI does not override fiduciary relationship in mediation

Right to Information

The Central Information Commission held that though the Right to Information Act, 2005 would override the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 8 of the RTI Act did allow confidentiality in the existence of a fiduciary relationship. It cautioned, if unchecked, parties would utilise their right to information to gather information from mediation as a pre-litigation step – an exploitation not envisaged by the law. Thus, it held public interest in divulging the details of an anticipated confidential mediation was not higher than the protection of such proceedings.

Relevant : Section 8 Right to Information Act, 2005 Act

Tags : RTI   FIDUCIARY   MEDIATION   SPOUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved