Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset  ||  Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay  ||  Supreme Court: Section 498A IPC Applies to Live-In Relationships in Nature of Marriage  ||  Supreme Court Awards Rs.83.38 Lakh to Child Left Paralysed, Stressing Impact on the Victim’s Future  ||  J&K and Ladakh High Court: Private Trust Cannot Oppose Wakf Takeover Without Legal Authority  ||  P&H HC: Courts Cannot Grant Protection to a Minor’s Live-In Relationship Prohibited By Law  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: NEET OMR Tampering Allegations Cannot Rest on Mere Suspicion  ||  Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction, Says a Reliable Dying Declaration Alone Can Sustain Guilt  ||  Bombay HC Criticises ITAT for Delays in Pronouncing Orders Beyond 90-Day Limit  ||  P&H High Court Criticises Punjab For Spending on Freebies and Ads While Delaying Employee Dues    

Jairam Ramesh in HC Against Amendments in PMLA Through Money Bills - (28 Feb 2019)

Senior advocate P Chidambaram and advocate Abhishek Jebraj, appearing for Jairam Ramesh, told the court that the amendments made to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) were 'unconstitutional' and 'illegal' as they have no relation to the money bill provisions enumerated in Article 110 of the Constitution.

Tags : COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved