Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice  ||  Cal HC: CESTAT Appeals Abate After Resolution Plan Success; CENVAT Reversal Requires No Pre-Deposit  ||  Bom HC: SEBI Settlement Doesn’t Protect Accused from Criminal Liability in Serious Economic Offences  ||  SC Directs States to Notify Eco-Sensitive Zones Around Tiger Reserves and Regulate Tiger Safaris  ||  SC: Its 2024 Order Letting Union Review Benami Act Cases Based on 'Ganpati Dealcom' was Incorrect  ||  SC: Rejection of Income Tax Settlement Application Doesn’t Bar Assessee from Contesting Assessment  ||  SC Informed Accessibility Facilities for Visually Impaired Candidates in AIBE and CLAT Expected Soon  ||  Supreme Court: Pendency of Writ Proceedings Does Not Bar Availing Alternative Statutory Remedies    

CIVIL - Only Advocates can Plead and Argue on Behalf of Litigants Before Courts: Calcutta HC - (25 Feb 2019)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court has observed that acting and appearing for another will not include a right to plead or argue before a court of law and held that only advocates enrolled under Advocates Act are authorised to plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ONLY ADVOCATES CAN PLEAD AND ARGUE ON BEHALF OF LITIGANTS BEFORE COURTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved