Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies  ||  Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester  ||  J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature  ||  Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration  ||  Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation  ||  SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights    

CONTEMPT OF COURT - Ericsson Case: SC Holds Anil Ambani Guilty of Contempt, Asks Him to Pay Rs. 453 cr or Face Jail - (20 Feb 2019)

CONTEMPT OF COURT

Supreme Court has held Reliance Group chairman and its two directors guilty of contempt for willfully not paying Rs. 550 crore to Ericsson and asked Anil Ambani to pay Rs. 453 crore to Ericsson in four weeks, failing which he will have to serve three months of jail term.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ANIL AMBANI   ERRICSON CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved