Madras High Court: No Appeal Lies Against E-Court Status or Adjournment Orders  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Judicial Officer Promotion Cannot be Denied on Complaint Without Disciplinary Action  ||  Delhi High Court: January 1 as Deemed Service Date For Delhi and Andaman Civil and Police Officers  ||  Delhi High Court: Private Media Houses Performing Public Functions are Subject to Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Rajasthan High Court Orders Registration of Pets That May Pose a Threat to Human Life  ||  Delhi High Court: NSE Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act  ||  Bombay High Court: Sikh Exemption From Helmet Rule is a Reasonable Classification under Article 14  ||  Supreme Court: Advocate Cannot Enter a Compromise Without the Client’s Authorisation  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Must Protect Every Accused From Mob Violence  ||  Supreme Court: Gujarat Municipal Election Candidates Must Disclose Their Spouses’ Assets    

Court has to Confine Itself to 'Disobeyed' Order While Exercising Contempt Jurisdiction: SC - (08 Feb 2019)

Supreme Court has reiterated that, while exercising the contempt jurisdiction, the court has to confine itself to the four corners of the order alleged to have been disobeyed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONTEMPT JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved