Supreme Court: Amalgamating Company Loss Cannot be Set Off Against Amalgamated Income  ||  Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Deposition Admissible to the Extent it is Found Credible and Reliable  ||  SC Upholds Penalty on Bank For Delay in Cheque Presentation under Consumer Protection Act  ||  Karnataka High Court Orders Strict Statewide Implementation of Menstrual Leave Policy  ||  Delhi HC: Emergency Arbitrator Awards are Not Binding on Indian Courts in Interim Relief Proceedings  ||  Del HC Imposes ?10L Fine on Parle Agro For Non-Disclosure of Sales Revenue in Pepsico Trademark Case  ||  Supreme Court: Spouse Cannot Withdraw Consent for Mutual Divorce After Settlement Agreement  ||  Supreme Court Suspends PC Act Sentence of Former Minister Anosh Ekka, Flags Overlapping CBI Cases  ||  Supreme Court: Magistrate’s Probe Order Can’t be Quashed on Accused’s Defence  ||  Delhi High Court: No Adverse Inference if Handwriting Sample Refused Without Section 73 Disclosure    

SC Seeks Reply from Centre As To Why Must Convicts Not Be Debarred from Contesting Elections for Life - (24 Nov 2015)

Supreme Court has sought reply from Centre to explain why convicts must not be debarred from contesting in elections for life. The current law debars a person convicted for two or more years from contesting elections for a minimum of six and maximum of ten years only, depending on the offence.

Tags : SUPREME COURT  CENTRE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved