Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail  ||  Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online  ||  Jharkhand HC: Interest under Employees' Compensation Act Runs From Date of Accident  ||  Bombay HC Quashes Wakf Property Mutation as Enemy Property, Mandates Due Process  ||  J&K&L High Court: Limitation Must be Decided Before Hearing Appeal Against 31-Year-Old Mutation  ||  Allahabad HC Summons UP Home Secretary Over Delay in Custodial Death Compensation Guidelines  ||  Delhi HC Differs with DPIIT Paper, Says ChatGPT Injunction Would Hurt AI Development  ||  Supreme Court: MHADA can Enforce Developer's Rehabilitation Commitments  ||  SC: Transfer of Defrauded Funds To Accused's Account Alone Cannot Warrant Clubbing FIRs  ||  Supreme Court: States with Under 1,000 Consumer Cases Can Abolish Select District Commissions    

NIA Court Shouldn’t have Accepted Photocopies as Proof in Malegaon Case: Bombay High Court - (24 Jan 2019)

Bombay High Court has said the special NIA court should not have accepted photocopies of the statements of witnesses and confessions of accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case as secondary evidence.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   MALEGAON CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved