Ker. HC: Independent Evidence of Accomplice Sufficient in Itself to Sustain Conviction  ||  Del HC: Nodal Authority Appointed for Drafting Procedure to Prevent Tree Felling in North Campus, DU  ||  Ker. HC: Baseless Apprehensions That Lawyer Will Act Illegally Should Not be Made by Courts  ||  Mobile e-Sewa Kendra on Bharat Benz Minibus Launched by Kerala High Court  ||  Kar. HC: Service Charge Cap on App-Based Auto Rides Upheld  ||  Plea by Moti Mahal in Delhi High Court for Cancellation of Daryaganj Restaurant’s Trademark  ||  Allahabad HC: Police Officials Duty Bound to Produce Accused Before Court  ||  Kerala High Court: Court Granting Bail Can Cancel it, if Conditions are Violated  ||  Cal HC: Death to be Presumed of Employee Untraceable for 7 Years, Heirs Entitled to Terminal Benefit  ||  Bom. HC: One-Week Bail Granted to Life Convict to Appear in Entrance Test    

NIA Court Shouldn’t have Accepted Photocopies as Proof in Malegaon Case: Bombay High Court - (24 Jan 2019)

Bombay High Court has said the special NIA court should not have accepted photocopies of the statements of witnesses and confessions of accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case as secondary evidence.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   MALEGAON CASE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved