Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India || SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid || SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration || SC: No Quota Applies For Judicial Officers in District Judge Posts, Issuing Seniority Guidelines || SC: Interest Rate Disputes Doesn't Fall under Public Policy to Set Aside Arbitration Awards || SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue || Supreme Court: TIP is Unreliable if the Witness Saw the Accused Beforehand || Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices || AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation || SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement

Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau and ors v. Neyyattinkara P. Nagaraj and ors - (High Court of Kerala) (09 Nov 2015)

Justice not only done but also seen to be done: Kerala HC

Criminal

Kerala High Court held that the Director of Vigilance can give ‘timely directions’ while conducting investigation, but not after. Observations and findings on merits of the court below on the investigation below were set aside. The matter pertained to a Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau of Kerala investigation into an alleged demand of Rs. 5 crores to renew bar licences by Kerala’s Finance Minister. The Court cautioned against the possibility of an improper investigation by State a department when the accused endured as a Minister in the government.

Tags : VIGILANCE MINISTER IMPROPER INVESTIGATION

Share :