SC: Casual Workers Can't be Denied Regularisation if Similar Daily Wagers were Regularised || Supreme Court: Illegal Change of Land Use under Punjab Act Cannot be Legalised Later || Allahabad High Court: Magistrate Must Consider Closure Report Even After Taking Cognizance || Allahabad HC: CGST Arrest Memo Must Include Grounds as Annexure; Reasons to Believe Not Needed || Kerala HC: Petitioner’s Identity Must be Verified Via SHO in Cases of Bank Account Defreezing || J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC || Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment || Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues || SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted || Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules

Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau and ors v. Neyyattinkara P. Nagaraj and ors - (High Court of Kerala) (09 Nov 2015)

Justice not only done but also seen to be done: Kerala HC

Criminal

Kerala High Court held that the Director of Vigilance can give ‘timely directions’ while conducting investigation, but not after. Observations and findings on merits of the court below on the investigation below were set aside. The matter pertained to a Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau of Kerala investigation into an alleged demand of Rs. 5 crores to renew bar licences by Kerala’s Finance Minister. The Court cautioned against the possibility of an improper investigation by State a department when the accused endured as a Minister in the government.

Tags : VIGILANCE MINISTER IMPROPER INVESTIGATION

Share :