Patna HC: Possessing Cough Syrup With under 2.5% Codeine Without Authorisation Attracts the NDPS Act  ||  Madras HC: Person Who Converts to Islam Cannot Claim Backward Class Muslim Status  ||  Madras High Court Lays Down Guidelines For Surrogacy Custody and Parentage Applications  ||  Bombay High Court: Residence Proof is Mandatory For RTE Neighbourhood School Admissions  ||  Madras HC Strikes Down TN Law Mandating Registrar’s Title Verification Before Property Registration  ||  Bombay HC Allows Galli News to Report Medical Negligence But Bars Defamatory Hospital Imputations  ||  Supreme Court: Parents’ Loss Cannot Be Measured With Arithmetical Precision  ||  Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Remains Valid Despite Minor Attestation Discrepancies  ||  Calcutta High Court: Section 107 BNSS Property Attachment Cannot be Used as a Recovery Tool  ||  Ker HC: Elected Representatives Must Swear by God or Affirm, Cannot Invoke Specific Deities in Oath    

Zillion Infra Projects (P) Ltd. v. Fab-Tech Works & Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (02 Nov 2015)

Invocation of bank guarantee restricted only for fraud and irretrievable injustice

MANU/DE/3350/2015

Arbitration

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal against an order restraining the encashment of a bank guarantee by the Appellant. It noted that as per precedent laid down, a Court could prevent exercise of a guarantee given only in case of fraud or of irretrievable injustice being perpetrated on the giver of such guarantee. The Respondent’s claim of being prejudiced because it was likely to succeed at arbitration against the Appellant failed to satisfy either of the two criteria. By preventing encashment of the guarantee by the Appellant, the Single judge in the previous decision had defeated the purpose behind the bank guarantee.

Relevant : U.P. State Sugar Corpn. v. Sumac International Ltd. MANU/SC/0380/1997 I.T.C. Ltd. v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal MANU/SC/0968/1998 Himadri Chemicals Industries Ltd. v. Coal Tar Refining Co. MANU/SC/3256/2007

Tags : BANK GUARANTEE   PREJUDICE   FUTURE SUCCESS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved