P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order  ||  Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate  ||  Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award  ||  Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence  ||  SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act  ||  SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act  ||  SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws  ||  SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer  ||  SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings    

Haldiram Bhujiawala and Ors. v. Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar and Ors. - (High Court of Delhi) (19 Oct 2015)

Deciphering Haldiram: Court finds needle in bhujia

MANU/DE/3333/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

In a convoluted and long-standing case involving a devolved Haldiram brand, the Delhi High Court assessed plethoric familial disputes, sprinkled with trade mark claims, to come to the conclusion that the trial court was correct in its determination that Appellants’ use of the brand Haldiram Bhujiawala had caused irreparable harm to the Respondents’ business ‘Haldiram’. The Court dismissed contentions that the trial court had conducted a ‘mini-trial’ in the grant of temporary injunction at an interim stage of legal proceedings.

Relevant : Anand Prasad Agarwalla v. Tarkeshwar Prasad and Ors.MANU/SC/0350/2001 Wander Limited and Anr. v. Antox India Pvt. Limited MANU/SC/0595/1990 ALKEM Laboratories Limited v. Mega International (Private) Limited MANU/DE/0957/2007

Tags : HALDIRAM   INTERIM INJUNCTION   MINI TRIAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved