SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law  ||  SC: Gratuity May be Withheld While Criminal or Disciplinary Proceedings are Pending Against Employee  ||  SC: Weapon Recovery Useless Without Proof Linking it to Crime under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  SC: Fines Also Run Concurrently When Sentences For Multiple Offences Run Concurrently  ||  SC Dissolves 10-Year Estranged Marriage, Quashes 80+ Cases in 'Matrimonial Mahabharata' Dispute  ||  SC: Board Resolution Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Director’s Knowledge of Company Affairs  ||  Raj HC: Industrial Tribunal Allowing Workman Legal Representation But Denying Employer is Unequal  ||  Karnataka HC: Service Bonds Enforceable on Students With Subsidised Education, Not Bonded Labour  ||  Gauhati HC: Challenge to Marks Barred by Constructive Res Judicata When Party Accepts Limited Remand  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't be Quashed Pre-Trial if Sec 138 NI Act Conditions Met    

Orbit Buyers Can’t Name Bank in Plea: Bombay High Court - (29 Oct 2018)

Bombay High Court, in a setback to individuals who had purchased flats in the 32-storey ultra-luxury residential tower Orbit Haven at Nepean Sea Road by paying Rs 15 and Rs 30 crore, has ruled that Axis Bank cannot be named as a party in the civil suit filed by the buyers.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   ORBIT BUYERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved