Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training  ||  Delhi High Court Quashed Cases over Allegations of Excess Lead Content in Maggi Noodles  ||  Madras High Court: Advocates Cannot Hinder Police From Producing Arrested Lawyers Before a Court  ||  Allahabad HC Awarded Rs. 4.75 Lakh Compensation Over Illegal Vehicle Confiscation in a Beef Case  ||  Allahabad High Court: Strong Suspicion, Not Proof of Guilt, is Sufficient to Frame Charges  ||  Delhi HC: Prior Sanction Not Required Where Cognizance Preceded 2018 PC Act Amendment  ||  Bombay High Court: The Notion of a "Perfect Victim" in Rape Cases is a Myth  ||  Allahabad High Court: Prior Agreement With Inquiry Report Doesn't Vitiate Disciplinary Proceedings    

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and anr v. Union of India and ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Nov 2015)

Supreme Court extends time for NJAC suggestions

Constitution

The Supreme Court of India extended the time available for putting forth suggestions to constitute a more transparent collegiate system for selection of judges to the close of business on 13 November 2015. It also acceded to the Attorney General’s offers of issuing a public notice seeking thoughts on the issue and web-hosting a compilation of recommendations received in four categories: transparency, collegium secretariat, eligibility criteria and complaints; the Attorney General added a fifth, ‘Miscellaneous’ category for the many suggestions that could not be included in the other categories. Suggestions received and compiled can be ACCESSED HERE.

Tags : NJAC   RECOMMENDATIONS   EXTENSION   TIME  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved