Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and anr v. Union of India and ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Nov 2015)

Supreme Court extends time for NJAC suggestions

Constitution

The Supreme Court of India extended the time available for putting forth suggestions to constitute a more transparent collegiate system for selection of judges to the close of business on 13 November 2015. It also acceded to the Attorney General’s offers of issuing a public notice seeking thoughts on the issue and web-hosting a compilation of recommendations received in four categories: transparency, collegium secretariat, eligibility criteria and complaints; the Attorney General added a fifth, ‘Miscellaneous’ category for the many suggestions that could not be included in the other categories. Suggestions received and compiled can be ACCESSED HERE.

Tags : NJAC   RECOMMENDATIONS   EXTENSION   TIME  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved