Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and anr v. Union of India and ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Nov 2015)

Supreme Court extends time for NJAC suggestions

Constitution

The Supreme Court of India extended the time available for putting forth suggestions to constitute a more transparent collegiate system for selection of judges to the close of business on 13 November 2015. It also acceded to the Attorney General’s offers of issuing a public notice seeking thoughts on the issue and web-hosting a compilation of recommendations received in four categories: transparency, collegium secretariat, eligibility criteria and complaints; the Attorney General added a fifth, ‘Miscellaneous’ category for the many suggestions that could not be included in the other categories. Suggestions received and compiled can be ACCESSED HERE.

Tags : NJAC   RECOMMENDATIONS   EXTENSION   TIME  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved