SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and anr v. Union of India and ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Nov 2015)

Supreme Court extends time for NJAC suggestions

Constitution

The Supreme Court of India extended the time available for putting forth suggestions to constitute a more transparent collegiate system for selection of judges to the close of business on 13 November 2015. It also acceded to the Attorney General’s offers of issuing a public notice seeking thoughts on the issue and web-hosting a compilation of recommendations received in four categories: transparency, collegium secretariat, eligibility criteria and complaints; the Attorney General added a fifth, ‘Miscellaneous’ category for the many suggestions that could not be included in the other categories. Suggestions received and compiled can be ACCESSED HERE.

Tags : NJAC   RECOMMENDATIONS   EXTENSION   TIME  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved