SC: Bribe Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt without Proof of Demand under PC Act || SC: Cut Power, Water to Bulk Waste Generators Violating Solid Waste Rules || SC: RPF Employee Who Conceals Criminal Case Can be Discharged at Any Stage || SC: Police can Register FIR Despite Magistrate Rejecting S.156(3) CrPC Application || SC: Criminal Acquittal Alone Cannot Prove Absence of Negligence in Accident Claims || SC: Referral Fees Earned By Auto Dealers for Bank, Insurance Promotion Taxable as Service Tax || Supreme Court Revisits the definition of “Industry”: 9-Judge Bench Reformulates the 1978 Triple Test || Delhi HC: Exam Integrity is a Shared Duty of Candidates and Authorities || Delhi High Court: POCSO Allows Child Witness Cross-Examination but Bars Aggressive Questioning || Kerala HC: Christian Women May File Divorce Pleas Where They Reside

Greater vigilance for multiple directorships and common addresses of companies- (Ministry of Corporate Affairs) (03 Nov 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1476/2015

Company

The Special Investigation Team has sought permission from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to take action against violations of the Companies Act, 1956, particularly against persons holding Directorships in more than 20 companies. It also intends to bring into scrutiny addresses at which 20 or more companies have been shown to be operating from.

Tags : COMPANY ADDRESS OPERATING DIRECTORSHIP

Share :