SC: DRT Auction Sale Valid Despite Failure to Serve Order XXI Rule 22 Notice  ||  SC: Legal Representatives Entitled to Motor Accident Compensation without Financial Dependency  ||  SC: Re-Employed Officers May be Classified Differently from Regular Officers  ||  Supreme Court Questions Union's Opposition to Global Food Package Labelling Norms  ||  SC: S.42 NDPS Act Compliance Need Not be Absolute When Immediate Seizure is Required  ||  SC Clarifies Whether Tenancy Ends after Landlord-Tenant Execute Agreement to Sell  ||  SC Levies Rs. 10 Lakh Cost on Reliance Industries for Hindering 20-Year-Old NTPC Suit  ||  P&H HC: Authorities Obligated to Act if Protests Escalate into Violence  ||  Allahabad HC: Allottee Aware of Reduced Lease Area Not Entitled to Full Zero-Period Benefit  ||  Delhi HC: 2015 Commercial Courts Act Applicable to Suits Instituted Before its Enactment    

Place of Arbitration Doesn’t Ipso Facto Assume Status of Seat: Supreme Court - (25 Sep 2018)

Supreme Court has held that place of arbitration does not ipso facto assume the status of its seat and observed that ‘venue’ cannot be equated with the seat of arbitration or place of arbitration which has a different connotation.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved