Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction  ||  SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others  ||  SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred  ||  SC: Complaint U/S 175(4) BNSS Against a Public Servant Must Meet the Conditions of Section 175(3)  ||  P&H HC: Customary Restrictions Can't Stop Widow From Alienating Non-Ancestral Property  ||  Delhi High Court: SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Directive on Written Arrest Grounds Applies Prospectively  ||  MP HC: MPPSC Cannot Reject Doctors For PG Additional Registration Not Mentioned in the Advertisement  ||  Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Carries Strong Presumption of Genuineness  ||  SC: Registry Cannot Intrude Into Judiciary’s Exclusive Domain By Questioning Why a Party is Impleaded  ||  Calcutta HC: Third-Party Suits in a Deity’s Name are Allowed Only When The Sebait Loses Authority    

Charging People U/S 295 IPC for Questioning Superstitions Violates Articles 14 & 19: Bombay HC - (18 Sep 2018)

Bombay High Court has ruled that charging people under Section 295 of Indian Penal Code merely for questioning superstition and traditional authority violates Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   SUPERSTITION   IPC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved