Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction  ||  Delhi High Court: Software Receipts Not Taxable on PE Basis Already Rejected by ITAT  ||  Delhi High Court: Statutory Appeals Cannot Be Denied Due to DRAT Vacancies or Administrative Delays  ||  J&K&L HC: Failure to Frame Limitation Issue Not Fatal; Courts May Examine Limitation Suo Motu  ||  Bombay HC: Preventing Feeding Stray Dogs at Society or Bus Stop is Not 'Wrongful Restraint'  ||  Gujarat HC: Not All Injuries Reduce Earning Capacity; Functional Disability Must Be Assessed  ||  Delhi HC: Framing of Charges is Interlocutory and Not Appealable under Section 21 of NIA Act    

Khazir Mohammad Dar and Ors. Vs. State of J&K and Ors. - (High Court of Jammu and Kashmir) (31 Aug 2018)

State Government is liable to make the payment of electricity and water bills in respect of hotels/accommodations, occupied by security forces

MANU/JK/0699/2018

Civil

The simple and short grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that, although their hotels came to be occupied by the security forces from 1990 onwards without their consent, yet the Respondents directed all the Drawing & Disbursing Officers to ensure that necessary NOCs are obtained from the hoteliers on account of electricity and water charges before the payment of rent to them. The Petitioners contend that, the expenditure of water and electricity has to be borne by the Respondents and not by them.

It is the liability of the State Government to make the payment of electricity and water bills in respect of the hotels/accommodations, which have been occupied by the security forces, deployed for security purposes. However, the State Government has taken umbrage under the plea that, these hotels have been occupied on day today basis and, therefore, the owners have to meet the expenditure on account of payment of electricity and water tariff.

The State Government cannot take shelter and refuge under this plea, when there is no written agreement. The hotels appear to have been occupied by them without seeking the consent of the petitioners, who had no bargaining power and, therefore, this plea pales into insignificance, particularly when these hotels are in the possession of the security forces right from the date these have been occupied without any break and interruption.

The payment of water tax and electricity charges is the prerogative and liability of the State which the State has to discharge and each owner has to get the actual rent, out of which nothing would be deductible. The writ petitions are allowed and the communication is quashed. Respondents are directed not to deduct the electricity/water charges from the rentals paid to the writ Petitioners. They are further directed not to press the Petitioners for production of 'No Objection Certificates' before paying them the rentals. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of.

Tags : CHARGES   PAYMENT   LIABILITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved